By now, you've heard that Michael Gorman, ALA president-elect wrote an
article in Library Journal bashing bloggers. Specifically the bloggers that disagreed with an editorial he wrote discussing some of his concerns about Google Print and the Google phenomenon. I happen to agree with some of Gorman's concerns about users over-dependence on Google and the Web as a whole. However, he chose to paint all bloggers, or "Blog People", with the same brush. He
claimed later that his comments were satirical, which I find a little odd. He states that bloggers can't get published, so blog instead. Well, I've been published, thanks, but I also have opinions on issues of the day, which don't fit into the narrow field of 'juried' library journals.
There was much talk on the
ALA site in response. In the library blog world,
Jessamyn and
Karen have already discussed it, so I'll leave it in their far more capable hands.
What I find interesting is that non-library sites have picked this up, as well, like
Slashdot and
Metafilter. In particular look at Jessamyn's comments on Metafilter. Like her, I support Gorman for ALA president, but I think this is one more example of our 'professional' association being entirely unclear on the activities and interests of a huge number of its members.