Last week,
The Des Moines Register ran an
article--not a letter to the editor, mind--reporting on how a "Republican activist" and former Iowan called Senator Kerry a "traitor" and a "Benedict Arnold" for reporting to Congress after returning from Vietnam. The guy quoted from Swift Boat Veterans for Truth (?) claims Kerry fabricated everything he said before Congress, and yet Col. Day does admit that these things did happen. Huh? First, they need to get their story straight. Second, calling someone a traitor is no small thing. Third, this is just bad journalism, all round. Three Bush supporters quoted, but only one Kerry supporter? And little or no context given?
And are none of these veterans noticing that Pres. Bush has cut their benefits and made thousands of vets ineligible? I know that Vietnam is a hot topic still for those who lived through it, but there are so many more important things to be talking about right now. However, very few of them make Bush look good (the economy, health care, even the fight against terrorism). Oh, yeah, and Bush is coming back to Des Moines
again tomorrow. He's here all the time now--welcome to a swing state! I can only hope that some of the many veterans who think he's doing a piss-poor job come out and let him know that. Of course, with 'free speech zones', it's unlikely he'll ever know about it. Is this what they fought for?
(Coincidentally, I met Gene Thorson, who served with Kerry in Vietnam and is the only supporter quoted in the article, at a Women for Kerry dinner on Thursday, just before this came out. He's given up a lot of this last year to stump for Kerry with veterans groups, who have been largely supportive.)
Addendum: Looks like there's a
petition/letter urging the Bush campaign to admit its ties to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and/or condemn their tactics. Unlikely to happen, but it never hurts to ask, I guess.